Google Scholar does not disclose information about its content. Do not surround your terms in double-quotes ("") in this field.

A search in Google Scholar for "antimatter", with the scope limited to the Institute of Physics, misses three articles (published in 1973, 1999, and 2003). People who are used to finding what they are looking for on the first page in Google are likely to adopt the same behaviour when using Google Scholar; thus highly cited items will gain more citations and will continue to appear at the top of the page. Google Scholar Pros and Cons PROS CONS; All disciplines (including humanities); variety of formats e.g. Hence, a search for "mercury", for example, yields results relating to the planet, the chemical element, and the musician Freddie Mercury (though the latter does not appear at the top of the list). Even if you are not a Google user, using Google Classroom is a piece of cake. For example, MetaLib from Ex Libris displays the results in the original order dictated by the database and also as one merged, de-duplicated list sorted by relevance. Perhaps these sites are hiding somewhere in the Google Scholar result list, but it is doubtful that any user will be able find them among the tens of thousands of results. He highlighted the benefits of having the links in Google Scholar and explained the Google Scholar philosophy of informing the user in advance of whether the desired service, in this case the link to the full text, is available.

Design/methodology/approach – Chronicles the recent history of the Google Scholar search engine from its inception in November 2004 and critiques it with regard to its merits and demerits. Usually people find what they are looking for on the first page of results, thanks to the PageRank algorithm that Google uses to evaluate each Web page prior to user queries and without any relation to them.

Google Scholar does not disclose information about its content. Do not surround your terms in double-quotes ("") in this field.

A search in Google Scholar for "antimatter", with the scope limited to the Institute of Physics, misses three articles (published in 1973, 1999, and 2003). People who are used to finding what they are looking for on the first page in Google are likely to adopt the same behaviour when using Google Scholar; thus highly cited items will gain more citations and will continue to appear at the top of the page. Google Scholar Pros and Cons PROS CONS; All disciplines (including humanities); variety of formats e.g. Hence, a search for "mercury", for example, yields results relating to the planet, the chemical element, and the musician Freddie Mercury (though the latter does not appear at the top of the list). Even if you are not a Google user, using Google Classroom is a piece of cake. For example, MetaLib from Ex Libris displays the results in the original order dictated by the database and also as one merged, de-duplicated list sorted by relevance. Perhaps these sites are hiding somewhere in the Google Scholar result list, but it is doubtful that any user will be able find them among the tens of thousands of results. He highlighted the benefits of having the links in Google Scholar and explained the Google Scholar philosophy of informing the user in advance of whether the desired service, in this case the link to the full text, is available.

Design/methodology/approach – Chronicles the recent history of the Google Scholar search engine from its inception in November 2004 and critiques it with regard to its merits and demerits. Usually people find what they are looking for on the first page of results, thanks to the PageRank algorithm that Google uses to evaluate each Web page prior to user queries and without any relation to them.

Google Scholar does not disclose information about its content. Do not surround your terms in double-quotes ("") in this field.

A search in Google Scholar for "antimatter", with the scope limited to the Institute of Physics, misses three articles (published in 1973, 1999, and 2003). People who are used to finding what they are looking for on the first page in Google are likely to adopt the same behaviour when using Google Scholar; thus highly cited items will gain more citations and will continue to appear at the top of the page. Google Scholar Pros and Cons PROS CONS; All disciplines (including humanities); variety of formats e.g. Hence, a search for "mercury", for example, yields results relating to the planet, the chemical element, and the musician Freddie Mercury (though the latter does not appear at the top of the list). Even if you are not a Google user, using Google Classroom is a piece of cake. For example, MetaLib from Ex Libris displays the results in the original order dictated by the database and also as one merged, de-duplicated list sorted by relevance. Perhaps these sites are hiding somewhere in the Google Scholar result list, but it is doubtful that any user will be able find them among the tens of thousands of results. He highlighted the benefits of having the links in Google Scholar and explained the Google Scholar philosophy of informing the user in advance of whether the desired service, in this case the link to the full text, is available.

Design/methodology/approach – Chronicles the recent history of the Google Scholar search engine from its inception in November 2004 and critiques it with regard to its merits and demerits. Usually people find what they are looking for on the first page of results, thanks to the PageRank algorithm that Google uses to evaluate each Web page prior to user queries and without any relation to them.

Google Scholar does not disclose information about its content. Do not surround your terms in double-quotes ("") in this field.

A search in Google Scholar for "antimatter", with the scope limited to the Institute of Physics, misses three articles (published in 1973, 1999, and 2003). People who are used to finding what they are looking for on the first page in Google are likely to adopt the same behaviour when using Google Scholar; thus highly cited items will gain more citations and will continue to appear at the top of the page. Google Scholar Pros and Cons PROS CONS; All disciplines (including humanities); variety of formats e.g. Hence, a search for "mercury", for example, yields results relating to the planet, the chemical element, and the musician Freddie Mercury (though the latter does not appear at the top of the list). Even if you are not a Google user, using Google Classroom is a piece of cake. For example, MetaLib from Ex Libris displays the results in the original order dictated by the database and also as one merged, de-duplicated list sorted by relevance. Perhaps these sites are hiding somewhere in the Google Scholar result list, but it is doubtful that any user will be able find them among the tens of thousands of results. He highlighted the benefits of having the links in Google Scholar and explained the Google Scholar philosophy of informing the user in advance of whether the desired service, in this case the link to the full text, is available.

Design/methodology/approach – Chronicles the recent history of the Google Scholar search engine from its inception in November 2004 and critiques it with regard to its merits and demerits. Usually people find what they are looking for on the first page of results, thanks to the PageRank algorithm that Google uses to evaluate each Web page prior to user queries and without any relation to them.